Home > Positioning > Persons > Kierkegaard

Søren Kierkegaard (1813–1855)

Kierkegaard is the philosopher of the individual against the system. His work is an extended argument that the questions that matter most — how to live, what to commit to, who to become — cannot be answered by any philosophical system, including Hegel’s, because they require a decision that no amount of thought can substitute for. The three stages of existence — aesthetic, ethical, religious — are not a theory of human development but a map of fundamentally different ways of being in the world, each with its own coherence and its own failure, and the movement between them is not logical progression but a leap. Kierkegaard wrote under pseudonyms not as a literary device but as a philosophical method: each pseudonym inhabits a stage from within, and no authorial voice stands above them to pronounce the verdict.

Life

Born in Copenhagen in 1813, the youngest of seven children. His father, Michael Pedersen Kierkegaard, was a wealthy retired merchant haunted by guilt — he believed he had cursed God as a boy on a Jutland heath, and that his family was under a divine sentence. Five of the seven children died before their father; Søren believed he too would die young. The atmosphere of guilt, melancholy, and intense religiosity shaped everything.

He studied theology and philosophy at the University of Copenhagen, where he encountered Hegelianism — then dominant in Danish intellectual life — and began the critique that would occupy him for the rest of his career. He became engaged to Regine Olsen in 1840 and broke the engagement in 1841 — an act he described as a sacrifice and that he returned to obsessively in his writings. The reasons remain debated: religious vocation, melancholy, the conviction that marriage would compromise the absoluteness of his commitment.

He published prolifically in the 1840s — the pseudonymous works (Either/Or, Fear and Trembling, The Concept of Anxiety, Concluding Unscientific Postscript) alongside signed devotional and ethical works (Edifying Discourses, Works of Love). In 1854–55 he launched a public attack on the Danish state church, arguing that institutional Christianity had betrayed the Christianity of the New Testament. He collapsed on the street in October 1855 and died six weeks later, at forty-two.

The three stages of existence

Kierkegaard’s pseudonymous works map three stages (or “spheres”) of existence — not as a developmental sequence but as qualitatively different modes of being:

The aesthetic stage. The aesthete lives in the moment — in sensation, imagination, pleasure, intellectual play, the cultivation of experience for its own sake. The aesthetic life can be refined (Don Juan, the seducer, the Romantic ironist) or crude, but its structure is the same: the avoidance of commitment, the flight from boredom through the rotation of pleasures. Its failure is despair — not dramatic despair but the quiet recognition that a life of sensation and play cannot sustain itself. The aesthete eventually faces the emptiness of uncommitted existence.

The ethical stage. The ethical person commits — to marriage, to vocation, to duty, to the universal moral law. The ethical life gives existence continuity, seriousness, and responsibility. Judge Wilhelm in Either/Or argues that the aesthetic life is not wrong but immature — the ethical encompasses and surpasses it. But the ethical stage has its own failure: the recognition that the moral law makes demands the self cannot meet. Guilt — not over particular failures but over the structural impossibility of being fully good — drives the ethical individual to the boundary of the religious.

The religious stage. The religious stage is reached not by argument but by a leap — a qualitative break with the logic of the ethical. Abraham’s sacrifice of Isaac (Fear and Trembling) is the paradigm case: from the standpoint of the ethical, Abraham is a murderer; from the standpoint of faith, he is the knight of faith. The religious stage involves a “teleological suspension of the ethical” — not the abolition of ethics but the recognition that the absolute relation to the absolute cannot be mediated by the universal. The individual stands alone before God.

Indirect communication

Kierkegaard’s use of pseudonyms is not a disguise but a method. Each pseudonymous author — the aesthete A, Judge Wilhelm, Johannes de Silentio, Johannes Climacus, Anti-Climacus — inhabits a stage from within and presents it with full seriousness. No authorial voice adjudicates between them. The reader is not told which stage to choose; the reader is placed in the position of having to decide.

This is “indirect communication” — the technique appropriate to existential questions that cannot be transmitted directly. A mathematical proof can be communicated directly: the conclusion follows from the premises and the reader’s situation is irrelevant. But the question “how should I live?” cannot be answered by argument — it requires the reader’s own decision, and any direct answer would substitute the author’s decision for the reader’s. Indirect communication communicates the question without usurping the answer.

Anxiety and despair

The Concept of Anxiety (1844, pseudonym Vigilius Haufniensis) and The Sickness Unto Death (1849, pseudonym Anti-Climacus) develop Kierkegaard’s analysis of the two fundamental moods of existence.

Anxiety (Angest) is not fear of a specific threat but the dizziness of freedom — the awareness that I can, that my existence is not determined, that I must choose. “Anxiety is the dizziness of freedom.” It arises from the self’s relation to its own possibility and is the precondition for both sin and authentic selfhood.

Despair (Fortvivlelse) is a misrelation within the self — the self’s failure to be itself. The self is “a relation that relates itself to itself” and can fail in two directions: by not willing to be itself (despair of weakness — running from one’s own selfhood) or by defiantly willing to be itself on its own terms (despair of defiance — the self that refuses to accept its dependence on the power that established it). Both are forms of the “sickness unto death” — not physical death but the spiritual death of a self that cannot rest in itself.

Where Kierkegaard stops

The three-stage framework places the aesthetic at the bottom — the life of sensation and imagination as immature, to be overcome by commitment (the ethical) and faith (the religious). This is the strongest philosophical argument for the subordination of the aesthetic: not Plato’s argument that art is thrice removed from truth, but the existential argument that a life organised around aesthetic experience is a life that avoids the seriousness of commitment. The aesthetic is coherent, seductive, and insufficient — it fails on its own terms, through despair, not through an external critique.

Kierkegaard’s religious stage — the absolute relation to the absolute, the single individual before God — is the culmination of his thought and its most difficult boundary. The leap of faith is non-rational, non-universalisable, non-communicable except indirectly. Whether this makes the religious stage the highest achievement of human existence or a retreat from the shared, communicable world is the question that divides Kierkegaard’s inheritors. The existentialist tradition (Heidegger, Sartre, Camus) took the analysis of anxiety and decision and dropped the religious stage; the theological tradition (Barth, Tillich) took the religious stage and dropped the anti-institutional radicalism. Neither inherits the whole.

Key works

See also: Hegel · Heidegger · Sartre · Nietzsche