Home > Positioning > Persons > Gause

Georgy Gause (1910–1986)

Gause demonstrated experimentally that two species competing for the same limiting resource cannot coexist indefinitely — one will always drive the other to extinction. The result, established through a series of laboratory experiments with Paramecium cultures in the early 1930s and published as The Struggle for Existence (1934), is now called Gause’s law or the competitive exclusion principle — though the standard name was coined not by Gause but by Garrett Hardin in a 1960 Science paper that gave the principle its canonical formulation and placed it at the centre of ecology textbooks. Gause’s own framing was more modest: the experimental confirmation of a prediction from the Lotka-Volterra competition equations. The theoretical prediction had been anticipated by Alfred Lotka (1925) and Vito Volterra (1926), whose differential equations for competing species showed competitive exclusion as one possible outcome. Gause’s contribution was to take the prediction out of mathematics and into the laboratory, confirming it experimentally and establishing what the conditions for coexistence actually require.

The competitive exclusion principle became a cornerstone of ecology through two subsequent developments: Hutchinson’s 1957 formalisation of the ecological niche as an n-dimensional hypervolume — which gave the principle a precise theoretical framework (two species cannot coexist on the same limiting resource became: two species cannot occupy the same niche) — and MacArthur’s community ecology programme, which built on the niche concept to develop the theory of species packing, limiting similarity, and island biogeography. Without Hutchinson’s 1957 formalisation, Gause’s result remains a laboratory finding; with it, the result becomes the null expectation of niche theory.

Life

Born 27 December 1910 in Moscow, Russian Empire. His father was a professor of architecture. Educated at Moscow State University (graduated 1931), where he studied zoology and became interested in mathematical ecology through the Lotka-Volterra equations. The Paramecium experiments were conducted while Gause was still a student and a junior researcher — The Struggle for Existence was published when he was twenty-three, in English, and attracted international attention immediately.

After the population-ecology work, Gause’s career took an unexpected turn. From the late 1930s onward, he shifted to antibiotic research — the search for antimicrobial compounds in soil microorganisms. During and after the Second World War, he worked at the Institute of New Antibiotics of the Soviet Academy of Medical Sciences, eventually becoming its director. He discovered and developed several antibiotics, including gramicidin S (a Soviet variant of gramicidin, used to treat wound infections during the war) and other antimicrobial agents. This second career was highly productive but largely separate from the ecological work for which he is remembered in the West.

The shift may have been partly driven by the political climate in Soviet biology. Lysenkoism — the state-enforced rejection of Mendelian genetics and Darwinian population ecology in favour of Trofim Lysenko’s pseudoscientific programme — made mathematical ecology politically dangerous in the Soviet Union from the late 1930s through the 1960s. Gause’s move to applied microbiology may have been a pragmatic adaptation to an environment in which theoretical ecology could not be safely pursued. Died 2 May 1986 in Moscow.

The competitive exclusion experiments

Gause’s experimental system was simple and rigorous: pure and mixed cultures of Paramecium species grown in test tubes on controlled bacterial food supplies. The experiments tested the Lotka-Volterra competition equations — the mathematical prediction that two species with identical resource requirements cannot coexist at equilibrium.

The P. aurelia / P. caudatum result. When grown separately, both species reached stable population sizes limited by the food supply. When grown together on the same food source, P. aurelia consistently drove P. caudatum to extinction — aurelia grew faster and outcompeted caudatum for the shared resource. The outcome confirmed the competitive exclusion prediction: complete overlap in resource use leads to the elimination of the inferior competitor.

The coexistence result. When Gause grew P. aurelia with P. bursaria — a species that feeds in a different part of the test tube (near the bottom, on yeast sediment, rather than in the upper water column) — the two species coexisted stably. The niche differentiation was sufficient to prevent competitive exclusion. Coexistence, on this account, requires that the competing species differ in their resource use or environmental requirements.

The Struggle for Existence (Williams & Wilkins, 1934) presented these results alongside a theoretical treatment of the Lotka-Volterra equations and a broader discussion of competition, predation, and the conditions for coexistence. The book was written in English, published in the United States, and addressed an international scientific audience — an unusual accomplishment for a young Soviet biologist.

Where Gause stops

The competitive exclusion principle is a laboratory result confirmed under controlled conditions — identical temperature, controlled food supply, well-mixed medium. Natural communities are not test tubes. The question that Gause’s principle immediately poses — if two species cannot share a niche, how do so many species coexist in nature? — was precisely the question that Hutchinson asked in 1959 (“Why are there so many kinds of animals?”) and that MacArthur and a generation of community ecologists spent their careers answering. The answers — niche differentiation, spatial heterogeneity, temporal variability, predation preventing competitive dominance, frequency-dependent selection — all start from Gause’s principle and explain why exclusion is the exception rather than the rule in natural communities. The principle’s value is as a null expectation from which the actual mechanisms of coexistence can be identified.

Gause did not develop his ecological work into a sustained research programme. The antibiotic career was productive on its own terms but took him out of theoretical ecology entirely. Whether the Lysenko climate was the decisive factor, or whether Gause would have moved to applied work in any case, is unclear — but the effect was that competitive exclusion entered Western ecology through The Struggle for Existence and was developed entirely by others. Gause’s role is foundational but narrow: the principle and the experiments, not a sustained programme.

Hubbell’s unified neutral theory of biodiversity (2001) later challenged the niche framework that Gause’s principle underpins, arguing that much of the species diversity in tropical forests and coral reefs can be explained by neutral drift without invoking niche differentiation. Whether the competitive exclusion principle is the right null model for community ecology — or whether neutral theory provides a better baseline — is debated in modern ecology.

Key works

See also: Hutchinson · MacArthur · Darwin · Darwinism