Home > Positioning > Close affinity > Aesthetics > The philosophy of art

The philosophy of art

The philosophy of art is where the dynamics of meaning kept the aesthetics label and worked openly under it — as aesthetics, as the philosophy of art, as poetics. The dynamic appears under each tradition’s own term: as expression, as metaphor, as symbolic form. Set them side by side.


Expression theoryCroce, then Collingwood — held that art and language are at bottom one activity. Croce: to intuit something fully is already to express it, and “the philosophy of language and the philosophy of art are the same thing.” The expressive act is named, and made the first form of knowing — the dynamic, here, called expression.

Collingwood worked the same identity and moved its centre. The artist begins not from a finished intuition but from “a vague perturbation” that becomes articulate only through the act of expressing it — meaning made in the making, not transcribed from a thought already complete. And where Croce kept the spark within the individual, Collingwood socialised it — the audience re-performs the expressive act, so understanding is itself a re-attunement, the meeting of expression and reception.

The theory of metaphor, in Ricoeur: metaphor is no ornament but “an event of thought.” A living metaphor “redescribes reality” — holding two senses in tension to make a meaning that was not there before, rather than relabelling an old one — the dynamic at its smallest visible unit, one turn of phrase enlarging what can be said.

Symbolic forms, in Cassirer: language, myth, art, religion, science are each a distinct symbolic form, each forming a world by its own logic, none reducible to another — register-plurality at world-forming scale, the many shared codes a subject lives among holding equal standing. His forms are forms for a subject, the transcendental seating that surfaced in the Davos debate with Heidegger — the plurality stands without that seating just as well, a difference in reading rather than a fault to fix.


Four traditions here, and in each the same motion of meaning under its own name — expression, metaphor, symbolic form. Whether aesthetics ranks above or below philosophy’s other branches is a separate argument — the counter-current’s, held on its own page — and not this surface’s fight.


See also: Aesthetics (the surface this belongs to) · Symbolic forms · The standing of aesthetics in philosophy