Home > Positioning > Persons > Collingwood

R. G. Collingwood (1889–1943)

Collingwood made expression the foundation of conscious life. Art is not imitation, not craft, not amusement — it is the process by which confused feeling becomes articulate. “Language and art become interchangeable” because both are the same activity: the act of making emotion lucid and intelligible. When expression fails — when a person disowns what they feel — consciousness becomes corrupt. Art is the community’s medicine for this corruption.

R. G. Collingwood (1889–1943). Philosopher, historian, archaeologist. Born in Cartmel Fell, Lancashire, son of the painter and antiquary W. G. Collingwood (John Ruskin’s secretary). Educated at Rugby and University College Oxford; Fellow of Pembroke College from 1912. Spent summers directing excavations of Roman sites in northern England — The Archaeology of Roman Britain (1930) and contributions to Roman Britain and the English Settlements (1936). The archaeological work was not a hobby alongside philosophy; it was the laboratory in which his philosophy of history was forged. Waynflete Professor of Metaphysical Philosophy at Oxford from 1935. A series of strokes from 1938 left him increasingly debilitated; he died at fifty-three.

Key concepts

Art as expression of emotion. The artist does not begin with a known emotion and then find a vehicle for it. The artist begins in a condition of agitation — “I feel… I don’t know what I feel.” The act of expression is the process by which this confused psychic disturbance becomes articulate. The emotion and its expression arise together; neither precedes the other. This rules out the craft model, where the end precedes the means: in art proper, the artist cannot know what they feel until the work is done.

Art, craft, amusement, magic. Collingwood distinguishes what art is from what it is not. Craft has a plan, separates means from ends, works with raw material toward a predetermined result. Amusement stimulates emotion and discharges it — the audience leaves satisfied but unchanged. Magic arouses emotions for their practical utility — a war dance instils courage. Art proper is what remains when you strip away the craft-structure, the amusement-function, and the magical-function.

Corrupt consciousness. When a person is aware of a feeling but refuses to acknowledge it — disowns it, represses it, projects it — the feeling remains shut up at the psychic level, excluded from conscious articulation. “If he deceives himself in this matter, he has sown in himself a seed which may grow into any kind of wickedness.” Corrupt consciousness extends from the individual to the collective. Entertainment that flatters, propaganda that channels, kitsch that provides the feeling of feeling without the labour of genuine expression — all corrupt the community’s ability to know what it feels. Art is “the community’s medicine for the worst disease of mind.”

Language and art. Language in its original state is not referential — it does not begin as a system for labelling objects. “In its original or native state, language is imaginative or expressive. Its function is to express emotion.” Since all expression is linguistic and all art is expression, every artistic act is a linguistic act and every genuinely expressive linguistic act is an artistic act. “Every utterance is a work of art.”

The three levels of mind. Psychical experience (raw feeling, shared with animals) — consciousness/imagination (where feeling is retained, transformed, and made articulate — where art happens) — intellect (analytical thought, relations between ideas). The crucial transition is from the first level to the second: psychic feelings must be raised to the imaginative level through an act of consciousness.

The community’s role. This is where Collingwood breaks decisively with Croce. The artist “undertakes his artistic labour not as a personal effort on his own private behalf, but as a public labour on behalf of the community.” The audience is collaborative, not receptive — understanding a work means re-performing the expressive act. Artists are formed by their communities and borrow freely from existing achievements. Expression is communal in its source and its destination.

Beyond aesthetics

The Idea of History (1946, posthumous). The historian’s task is to discover the thought behind the action — to re-enact past thought in the historian’s own mind. Not psychological reproduction but recovery of propositional content: the reasons, intentions, and beliefs that made the action intelligible. From his archaeological work, Collingwood learned that “knowledge comes only by answering questions” — evidence means nothing apart from the question it is summoned to answer.

An Essay on Metaphysics (1940). Metaphysics is the historical study of absolute presuppositions — the foundational assumptions that make particular forms of inquiry possible. Absolute presuppositions do not answer questions; they are what makes questions possible. They are not true or false. Different epochs rest on different presuppositions. Metaphysics is necessarily historical.

The New Leviathan (1942). Written during the war, debilitated by strokes. Civilisation is the progressive refinement of moral understanding; barbarism is not primitive simplicity but the active revolt against civilisation — the deliberate rejection of duty, reason, and self-knowledge. His target is Nazism and Fascism, understood not as throwbacks but as modern forms of barbarism that attack civilisation from within.

Contested receptions

Wollheim’s critical study. Richard Wollheim’s Art and Its Objects (1968) characterised the “Croce-Collingwood theory” as claiming the work of art is an inner mental state that may be externalised but need not be. This reading drew almost entirely on Book I of The Principles of Art — the section Collingwood himself described as “avowedly provisional.” When Book III is taken seriously, the charges collapse: Collingwood insists the medium is integral to the creative process and the audience is collaborative. But Wollheim’s influence was decisive — it buried the philosopher it claimed to engage with.

The “Croce-Collingwood theory” label. The label treats the two theories as interchangeable. This is defensible at the level of general orientation but obscures what makes Collingwood distinctive: the philosophy of language, the communal dimension, the role of the material medium, the three-level theory of consciousness. On these points, Collingwood and Croce hold competing commitments.

Recent revivals. Ridley, Davies, Wiltsher, and others have argued that the real Collingwood — the one who wrote Books II and III — has never been properly engaged with by his critics. Davies proposes a “performative” reading: the work of art as an activity rather than the product of an activity.

Where Collingwood stops

The expression theory illuminates the phenomenology of artistic creation — why artists report not knowing what they are making until the work reveals it, why technique alone does not produce art, why the same form can be art or entertainment depending on the process that generated it. Corrupt consciousness gives an account of cultural pathology that connects aesthetics, ethics, and politics without reducing one to another.

But Collingwood concedes the medium is practically necessary while maintaining it is theoretically dispensable. Whether that concession reveals something the theory cannot accommodate remains an open question. And the mechanism of expression remains individual consciousness raising its own feelings to clarity — the social dimension is added to the account rather than built into it.

Key works

See also: Croce · Hegel · Dewey