Home > Positioning > Persons > Lévi-Strauss

Claude Lévi-Strauss (1908–2009)

Lévi-Strauss brought Saussure’s structural linguistics into anthropology and, through anthropology, into the human sciences at large. His central claim is that the diverse cultural phenomena of human societies — kinship rules, myths, food preparation, classification systems — are generated by underlying structures of the human mind that operate through binary oppositions: nature/culture, raw/cooked, same/different. These structures are unconscious, universal, and formal: they work like a grammar, generating the surface diversity of cultures from a finite set of combinatorial rules. The anthropologist’s task is not to catalogue customs but to find the deep structure beneath them — to do for culture what linguistics did for language.

Life

Born in Brussels in 1908 to a French family. He studied law and philosophy at the Sorbonne, passed the agrégation in philosophy, and taught in secondary schools before being appointed to a position at the University of São Paulo in 1935. His fieldwork with the Nambikwara, Bororo, and Caduveo peoples of central Brazil — the basis of Tristes Tropiques (1955) — was his only extended period of ethnographic fieldwork, but it generated the observations he spent the rest of his career theorising.

He fled to New York during the war, where his encounter with the structural linguist Roman Jakobson at the New School for Social Research was the decisive intellectual event. Jakobson’s phonological analysis — reducing the diversity of speech sounds to a system of distinctive features defined by binary oppositions — gave Lévi-Strauss the model he would apply to kinship, myth, and culture at large. He returned to Paris after the war, held positions at the École Pratique des Hautes Études and the Collège de France (from 1959), and became the most prominent intellectual in France alongside Sartre — and Sartre’s principal antagonist. He died in Paris in 2009, aged one hundred.

Structural anthropology

Structural Anthropology (1958/1973) sets out the programme. Culture is structured like a language: it consists of signs (customs, institutions, myths) whose meaning is determined not by their content but by their relations to other signs — their position in a system of differences. The method is to identify the binary oppositions that generate the system and the transformations that relate one variant to another.

The Elementary Structures of Kinship (1949) applies the method to marriage rules. The incest prohibition — universal across cultures but taking different forms — is not a natural instinct but the fundamental cultural rule: it forces the exchange of women between groups, creating alliances and social structure. Kinship systems are analysed as systems of exchange governed by structural rules, analogous to the phonological rules governing sound systems. The diversity of kinship systems worldwide is generated by a small number of structural principles (restricted exchange, generalised exchange) and their transformations.

The raw and the cooked

The four-volume Mythologiques (1964–1971) — The Raw and the Cooked, From Honey to Ashes, The Origin of Table Manners, The Naked Man — analyses over 800 myths from the Americas, tracing how a single myth transforms as it travels across cultures. The transformations follow structural rules: elements are inverted, substituted, or recombined, but the underlying logic persists. The cooking of food — the transformation of the raw into the cooked — is the paradigmatic cultural act: nature transformed into culture through a process that is simultaneously material and symbolic.

The method is musical as much as linguistic. Lévi-Strauss organises the Mythologiques as a score: myths are “instruments” playing variations on shared themes, and the analysis reads across them like an orchestral score reads across parts. The analogy is deliberate — myth and music share the property of operating on the listener through structural repetition and variation rather than through semantic content.

The science of the concrete

The Savage Mind (La pensée sauvage, 1962) argues that “primitive” thought is not pre-logical or mystical but a rigorous science of the concrete — a mode of classification and reasoning that operates through sensory categories (colours, textures, tastes, spatial relations) rather than abstract concepts. The bricoleur — the handyman who works with whatever materials are at hand — is the figure for this mode of thought, in contrast to the engineer who works from abstract plans. Both are rational; they operate at different levels of abstraction.

The book’s final chapter, “History and Dialectics,” is a direct polemic against Sartre’s Critique of Dialectical Reason. Sartre places history and the dialectic at the centre of human understanding; Lévi-Strauss argues that history is not a privileged mode of knowledge but one classification among others, and that the historical consciousness Sartre celebrates is a product of Western culture, not a universal human condition.

Where Lévi-Strauss stops

The structuralist programme is powerful as a method of analysis — finding the binary oppositions, the transformations, the deep grammar beneath surface diversity. The question is whether the structures are in the mind (as Lévi-Strauss claims — universal mental structures generating cultural diversity) or in the method (a way of organising data that the anthropologist brings to the material). Derrida’s “Structure, Sign, and Play” (1966) pressed this question: if structure requires a centre (an origin that is not itself structured), and if no such centre can be found, then the concept of structure itself is unstable. Lévi-Strauss’s own work hovers between acknowledging this instability (the “floating signifier,” the myth that tells itself through the mythmaker) and relying on the stability of universal mental structures.

The binary-opposition framework — nature/culture, raw/cooked, same/different — has been challenged as too rigid by later anthropology. Cultures do not always organise themselves through binary pairs; gradients, spectra, and multi-valued distinctions are at least as common. Whether the binary model is a feature of human cognition or a feature of structuralist method is debated. Post-structuralism (Derrida, Deleuze, Lyotard) took the critique further: the structures Lévi-Strauss finds are not fixed universals but historically contingent and internally unstable.

Key works

See also: Saussure · Derrida · Deleuze · Sartre